Retraction eines Papers hat praktisch keinen Einfluss auf weitere Zitationen The retraction of a paper has virtually no impact on future citations
Dieses Biblionetz-Objekt existiert erst seit Mai 2026.
Es ist deshalb gut möglich, dass viele der eigentlich vorhandenen Vernetzungen zu älteren Biblionetz-Objekten bisher nicht erstellt wurden.
Somit kann es sein, dass diese Seite sehr lückenhaft ist.
Bemerkungen
Data suggest the vast majority of retracted papers continue to be cited as if they had not been retracted. Even when citations of retracted papers do dwindle, it’s been unclear whether that’s due to the paper’s age rather than its editorial status.
Von AuthorAvery Orrall im Text Black marks on published papers don’t change citation rates, new study finds (2026) Although retraction is intended to remove published research from the citable literature, retraction does not stop the diffusion of the retracted paper. Empirical studies have shown that papers continue to be cited after being retracted (Bar-Ilan & Halevi, 2017; Bolland, Grey, & Avenell, 2021; Candal-Pedreira, Ruano-Ravina et al., 2020; Dal-Ré & Ayuso, 2020; Mott, Fairhurst, & Torgerson, 2019; Pfeifer & Snodgrass, 1990; Theis-Mahon & Bakker, 2020; van der Vet & Nijveen, 2016). For example, Dal-Ré and Ayuso (2020) studied citations to 460 retracted genetics articles and found that 23% of the citations were postretraction citations.
Von Tzu-Kun Hsiao, Jodi Schneider im Text Continued use of retracted papers (2021) 
Einträge in Beats Blog
Zitationsgraph
Zitationsgraph (Beta-Test mit vis.js)
7 Erwähnungen 
- Post retraction citations in context - a case study (Judit Bar-Ilan, Gali Halevi) (2017)
- For how long and with what relevance do genetics articles retracted due to research misconduct remain active in the scientific literature (Rafael Dal-Ré, Carmen Ayuso) (2020)
- Does retraction after misconduct have an impact on citations? - A pre–post study (Cristina Candal-Pedreira, Alberto Ruano-Ravina, Esteve Fernández, Jorge Ramos, Isabel Campos-Varela, Mónica Pérez-Ríos) (2020)
- Citation of retracted publications - A challenging problem (Mark J. Bolland, Andrew Grey, Alison Avenell) (2021)
- Continued use of retracted papers - Temporal trends in citations and (lack of) awareness of retractions shown in citation contexts in biomedicine (Tzu-Kun Hsiao, Jodi Schneider) (2021)
- Publishers’ responses to integrity concerns – does the type of notice influence subsequent citations? - A cohort study (Hugo Studd, Alison Avenell, Andrew Grey, Mark J Bolland) (2026)
- Black marks on published papers don’t change citation rates, new study finds (AuthorAvery Orrall) (2026)
Biblionetz-History 